The Fair Housing Act
Secure.gov sites utilize HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// indicates you've safely linked to the.gov site. Share sensitive info just on authorities, protected sites.
- About - The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report a Violation
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Chief law officer ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Liberty FOIA Civil Liberty FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Attorney General
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Rights Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., prohibits discrimination by direct suppliers of housing, such as property owners and realty business as well as other entities, such as towns, banks or other loan provider and property owners insurance coverage business whose discriminatory practices make housing unavailable to persons because of:
race or color.
faith.
sex.
nationwide origin.
familial status, or.
disability.
In cases involving discrimination in mortgage loans or home improvement loans, the Department might file suit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is evidence of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a rejection of rights to a group of persons raises a problem of public importance. Where force or danger of force is used to reject or disrupt fair housing rights, the Department of Justice might set up criminal procedures. The Fair Housing Act likewise offers treatments for dealing with specific problems of discrimination. Individuals who believe that they have actually been victims of an unlawful housing practice, may submit a grievance with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or submit their own claim in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings matches on behalf of people based on recommendations from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
One of the main goals of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to restrict race discrimination in sales and leasings of housing. Nevertheless, more than thirty years later, race discrimination in housing continues to be an issue. Most of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases include claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing companies try to disguise their discrimination by giving incorrect details about availability of housing, either stating that absolutely nothing was available or steering homeseekers to specific locations based on race. Individuals who receive such false information or misdirection may have no understanding that they have been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has actually brought lots of cases alleging this type of discrimination based upon race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program looks for to reveal this type of surprise discrimination and hold those responsible liable. Most of the mortgage lending cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have actually alleged discrimination based on race or color. Some of the Department's cases have actually also declared that municipalities and other city government broke the Fair Housing Act when they rejected permits or zoning modifications for housing advancements, or relegated them to primarily minority communities, due to the fact that the potential homeowners were expected to be mainly African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing based upon faith. This prohibition covers instances of obvious discrimination against members of a specific religious beliefs too less direct actions, such as zoning regulations designed to limit the usage of personal homes as a locations of praise. The variety of cases filed because 1968 alleging religious discrimination is small in contrast to a few of the other forbidden bases, such as race or national origin. The Act does consist of a restricted exception that allows non-commercial housing run by a religious organization to reserve such housing to individuals of the exact same religious beliefs.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Sexual Harassment
The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. Over the last few years, the Department's focus in this location has actually been to challenge sexual harassment in housing. Women, especially those who are bad, and with limited housing options, often have little recourse but to endure the embarrassment and destruction of unwanted sexual advances or danger having their families and themselves removed from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is focused on property managers who create an untenable living environment by requiring sexual favors from renters or by creating a sexually hostile environment for them. In this manner we look for both to acquire relief for tenants who have been dealt with unfairly by a property owner because of sex and also deter other possible abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without dealing with consequences. In addition, prices discrimination in mortgage financing might also adversely impact ladies, particularly minority women. This kind of discrimination is illegal under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination based upon nationwide origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the country of an individual's birth or where his/her forefathers stem. Census information suggest that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing section of our nation's population. The Justice Department has taken enforcement action versus municipal federal governments that have tried to lower or restrict the number of Hispanic families that might live in their communities. We have sued lenders under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have enforced more rigid underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less favorable terms for Hispanic customers. The Department has actually likewise sued loan providers for discrimination against Native Americans. Other areas of the nation have actually experienced an increasing variety of national origin groups within their populations. This includes new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the previous Soviet Union, and other parts of Eastern Europe. We have taken action versus personal landlords who have actually victimized such individuals.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, prohibits discrimination in housing versus households with kids under 18. In addition to restricting a straight-out rejection of housing to households with children, the Act likewise avoids housing suppliers from enforcing any unique requirements or conditions on renters with custody of children. For instance, proprietors might not find households with kids in any single portion of a complex, position an unreasonable limitation on the overall variety of individuals who may live in a home, or restrict their access to leisure services provided to other occupants. In a lot of instances, the changed Fair Housing Act prohibits a housing provider from refusing to lease or sell to households with children. However, some centers might be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This kind of housing, which satisfies the requirements set forth in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, might run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has published policies and additional assistance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of special needs in all kinds of housing transactions. The Act defines persons with a disability to indicate those individuals with mental or physical disabilities that considerably restrict one or more major life activities. The term mental or physical disability may consist of conditions such as blindness, hearing impairment, mobility disability, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcoholism, drug dependency, chronic tiredness, discovering special needs, head injury, and mental disease. The term significant life activity might include seeing, hearing, strolling, breathing, carrying out manual tasks, taking care of one's self, discovering, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act also safeguards persons who have a record of such a disability, or are considered as having such an impairment. Current users of prohibited controlled compounds, individuals founded guilty for prohibited manufacture or distribution of an illegal drug, sex wrongdoers, and juvenile offenders are ruled out handicapped under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act pays for no securities to people with or without impairments who provide a direct threat to the persons or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether somebody poses such a direct hazard needs to be made on a customized basis, however, and can not be based on general presumptions or speculation about the nature of an impairment. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's defenses for individuals with specials needs has concentrated on 2 major areas. One is guaranteeing that zoning and other policies worrying land usage are not employed to hinder the residential options of these individuals, including unnecessarily limiting communal, or gather together, domestic arrangements, such as group homes. The 2nd location is guaranteeing that recently constructed multifamily housing is constructed in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's ease of access requirements so that it is available to and functional by individuals with disabilities, and, in specific, those who use wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that forbid discrimination versus people with specials needs, consisting of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is enforced by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Liberty Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some people with specials needs might cohabit in congregate living plans, typically referred to as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act prohibits towns and other regional federal government entities from making zoning or land use choices or carrying out land use policies that omit or otherwise victimize individuals with disabilities. The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful--
- To use land use policies or actions that treat groups of individuals with impairments less favorably than groups of non-disabled persons. An example would be an ordinance restricting housing for persons with impairments or a specific type of special needs, such as psychological disease, from finding in a specific location, while enabling other groups of unrelated individuals to cohabit because location.
- To take action versus, or reject an authorization, for a home since of the impairment of people who live or would live there. An example would be denying a building authorization for a home since it was intended to provide housing for individuals with psychological retardation.
- To refuse to clear up lodgings in land use and zoning policies and treatments where such lodgings might be needed to manage persons or groups of individuals with specials needs a level playing field to utilize and take pleasure in housing. What constitutes a reasonable lodging is a case-by-case decision. Not all requested adjustments of guidelines or policies are affordable. If a requested modification enforces an undue monetary or administrative burden on a city government, or if an adjustment produces a fundamental alteration in a city government's land usage and zoning plan, it is not a "sensible" accommodation.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act defines discrimination in housing versus persons with specials needs to consist of a failure "to create and build" particular brand-new multi-family dwellings so that they are accessible to and functional by individuals with disabilities, and particularly people who utilize wheelchairs. The Act needs all newly constructed multi-family homes of four or more units meant for first tenancy after March 13, 1991, to have certain functions: an accessible entryway on an available route, accessible typical and public use locations, doors adequately wide to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible routes into and through each home, light switches, electric outlets, and thermostats in accessible place, reinforcements in bathroom walls to accommodate grab bar setups, and functional bathroom and kitchens set up so that a wheelchair can steer about the space.
Developers, home builders, owners, and architects responsible for the style or construction of brand-new multi-family housing may be held liable under the Fair Housing Act if their structures fail to fulfill these style requirements. The Department of Justice has brought numerous enforcement actions against those who failed to do so. The majority of the cases have been solved by consent decrees offering a variety of types of relief, including: retrofitting to bring unattainable features into compliance where practical and where it is not-- alternatives (monetary funds or other construction requirements) that will attend to making other housing units accessible; training on the accessibility requirements for those associated with the building procedure; a mandate that all brand-new housing projects adhere to the accessibility requirements, and financial relief for those injured by the violations. In addition, the Department has sought to promote accessibility through building regulations.